- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- SPARKX i7 vs X-SMART 3
Creality SPARKX i7 vs QIDI X-SMART 3
What SPARKX i7 does better (7) and where X-SMART 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SPARKX i7X-SMART 3
| SPARKX i7 | X-SMART 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 364 mm | 397 mm | −33 mm |
| Width | 362 mm | 370 mm | −8 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 362 mm | −135 mm |
| Weight | 9.1 kg | 10.5 kg | −1.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SPARKX i7 better than X-SMART 3?
- Build volume17.2 L vs 5.5 L3.1×
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · X-SMART 3: No
- Build height (Z)255 mm vs 170 mm+50%
- Max nozzle temperature300 °C vs 280 °C+7%
- Build width (X)260 mm vs 180 mm+44%
- Build depth (Y)260 mm vs 180 mm+44%
- Weight9.1 kg vs 10.5 kg+15%
Why is X-SMART 3 better than SPARKX i7?
- Number of supported materials3 vs 62×
- Max bed temperature100 °C vs 120 °C+20%
- Screen size2.8″ vs 4.3″+51%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Delivered as | Fully assembled | — |
| Klipper firmware | — | Yes |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 260 mm | 180 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 260 mm | 180 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 255 mm | 170 mm |
| Build volume | 17.2 L | 5.5 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 500 mm/s | 500 mm/s |
| Max acceleration | 10,000 mm/s² | — |
| Max volumetric flow | — | 30 mm³/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.3 mm | — |
| Vibration compensation (input shaping) | Yes | — |
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 300 °C | 280 °C |
| Direct-drive extruder | Yes | — |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Supported nozzle sizes (mm) | 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 | 0.4, 0.8 |
| Nozzle material | hardened steel | — |
| Swappable nozzle / hotend | Yes | — |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Filament cutter | Yes | — |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, PLA-CF | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, etc. |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | No |
| Multi-colour | ||
| Multi-colour printing | Yes | — |
| Max colours / materials | 4 | — |
| Multi-colour system | CFS | — |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 100 °C | 120 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | No | — |
| Actively heated chamber | No | — |
| Chamber light | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, Ethernet | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| App control | Yes | — |
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 4.3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Filament runout sensor | Yes | — |
| Power-loss recovery | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 362 mm | 370 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 362 mm |
| Height | 364 mm | 397 mm |
| Weight | 9.1 kg | 10.5 kg |
| Rated power | 10 W | 350 W |
Related comparisons
vs
Creality SPARKX i7vsBambu Lab A2L7.07.7vs
Creality SPARKX i7vsAnycubic Kobra X7.08.1vs
Creality SPARKX i7vsAnycubic Kobra 3 V27.08.2vs
Creality SPARKX i7vsCreality Hi7.07.1vs
Creality SPARKX i7vsFlashforge AD5X Mehrfarben- 600mm/s CoreXY Autokalibrierung7.07.3vs
Creality SPARKX i7vsCreality Ender 3 V47.05.9