How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Photon Mono 2 vs Hunter S

Anycubic Photon Mono 2 vs Flashforge Hunter S

What Photon Mono 2 does better (1) and where Hunter S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Anycubic Photon Mono 2
Anycubic · 2023Photon Mono 2
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $250
vs
Flashforge Hunter S
Flashforge · 2023Hunter S
4.7Score
3 advantages
Higher score
3.2Build volume3.4
2.6Ease of use7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Photon Mono 2Hunter S
235 × 390229360 × 560320
Photon Mono 2Hunter SDifference
Height390 mm560 mm−170 mm
Width235 mm360 mm−125 mm
Depth229 mm320 mm−91 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Photon Mono 2 better than Hunter S?

  1. Build depth (Y)89 mm vs 81 mm+10%

Why is Hunter S better than Photon Mono 2?

  1. Wi-FiNo · Photon Mono 2: Yes
  2. EthernetNo · Photon Mono 2: Yes
  3. Build height (Z)165 mm vs 180 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)DLP (resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)143 mm144 mm
Build depth (Y)89 mm81 mm
Build height (Z)165 mm180 mm
Build volume2.1 L2.1 L
Speed
Resin print speed50 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm—
Thickest layer height0.15 mm—
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamberYes—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class4K—
LCD resolution (px)4096 × 2560—
LCD size6.6″—
XY resolution50 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiNoYes
EthernetNoYes
USBYesYes
SD cardNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
App controlYes—
Screen size2.8″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Features
Built-in cameraNo—
Size & power
Width235 mm360 mm
Depth229 mm320 mm
Height390 mm560 mm
Weight4 kg—
Rated power48 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare