How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. HTX vs 4070 FX

3DLabs HTX vs WASP 4070 FX

What HTX does better (5) and where 4070 FX wins (1) — every spec side by side.

3DLabs HTX
3DLabs · 2021HTX
9.7Score
5 advantages≈ $15,500
Higher score
vs
WASP 4070 FX
WASP · 20224070 FX
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ $15,000
9.7Material versatility6.6

Why is HTX better than 4070 FX?

  1. Max nozzle temperature500 °C vs 280 °C+79%
  2. Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · 4070 FX: No
  3. Max bed temperature220 °C vs 120 °C+83%
  4. Finest layer height0.04 mm vs 0.05 mm+25%
  5. Max chamber temperature100 °C vs 70 °C+43%

Why is 4070 FX better than HTX?

  1. Number of supported materials6 vs 7+17%
Specifications

Side by side

3DLabs HTX3DLabs HTX≈ $15,5009.7
WASP 4070 FXWASP 4070 FX≈ $15,0006.2
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Motion system—Delta
Build volume
Build width (X)350 mm—
Build depth (Y)300 mm—
Build height (Z)300 mm—
Build volume31.5 L—
Speed
Max print speed—200 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height0.04 mm0.05 mm
Thickest layer height—0.35 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature500 °C280 °C
Default nozzle—0.7 mm
Supported materialsABS, ASA, PC, PEEK, PEI, PEKKWASP — TPU, TPE, PP, other — PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS
Number of supported materials67
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)YesNo
Print bed
Heated bedYesYes
Max bed temperature220 °C120 °C
Enclosure
Actively heated chamberYesYes
Max chamber temperature100 °C70 °C
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size7″7″
TouchscreenYesYes
Features
Filament runout sensorYes—
Size & power
Width—850 mm
Depth—770 mm
Height—1,950 mm
Weight—95 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare