How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Cube One vs 4070 FX

Renkforce Cube One vs WASP 4070 FX

What Cube One does better (1) and where 4070 FX wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Renkforce Cube One
Renkforce · 2023Cube One
1 advantage
vs
WASP 4070 FX
WASP · 20224070 FX
7.3Score
2 advantages≈ $15,000
Higher score

Why is Cube One better than 4070 FX?

  1. Weight2.9 kg vs 95 kg32.8×

Why is 4070 FX better than Cube One?

  1. Number of supported materials1 vs 77×
  2. EthernetNo · Cube One: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

WASP 4070 FXWASP 4070 FX≈ $15,0007.3
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Motion system—Delta
Build volume
Build width (X)80 mm—
Build depth (Y)80 mm—
Build height (Z)80 mm—
Build volume0.5 L—
Speed
Max print speed—200 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.05 mm
Thickest layer height—0.35 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—280 °C
Default nozzle0.7 mm0.7 mm
Filament diameter1.75 mm—
Supported materialsPLAWASP — TPU, TPE, PP, other — PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS
Number of supported materials17
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Max bed temperature—120 °C
Enclosure
Actively heated chamber—Yes
Max chamber temperature—70 °C
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetNoYes
USBYesYes
SD cardNo—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—7″
Touchscreen—Yes
Size & power
Width208 mm850 mm
Depth206 mm770 mm
Height254 mm1,950 mm
Weight2.9 kg95 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare