- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- HTX vs Cube One
3DLabs HTX vs Renkforce Cube One
What HTX does better (7) and where Cube One wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HTX better than Cube One?
- Build volume31.5 L vs 0.5 L63×
- Build height (Z)300 mm vs 80 mm3.8×
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · Cube One: No
- Build width (X)350 mm vs 80 mm4.4×
- Build depth (Y)300 mm vs 80 mm3.8×
- Number of supported materials6 vs 16×
- EthernetYes · Cube One: No
Why is Cube One better than HTX?
Cube One has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 350 mm | 80 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 300 mm | 80 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 80 mm |
| Build volume | 31.5 L | 0.5 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.04 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 500 °C | — |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.7 mm |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, ASA, PC, PEEK, PEI, PEKK | PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 6 | 1 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 220 °C | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | Yes | — |
| Max chamber temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Screen size | 7″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Filament runout sensor | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 208 mm |
| Depth | — | 206 mm |
| Height | — | 254 mm |
| Weight | — | 2.9 kg |
