- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 4070 FX vs 4070 ZX
WASP 4070 FX vs WASP 4070 ZX
What 4070 FX does better (0) and where 4070 ZX wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
4070 FX4070 ZX
| 4070 FX | 4070 ZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,950 mm | 1,950 mm | = |
| Width | 850 mm | 850 mm | = |
| Depth | 770 mm | 770 mm | = |
| Weight | 95 kg | 95 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 4070 FX better than 4070 ZX?
4070 FX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 4070 ZX better than 4070 FX?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · 4070 FX: Yes
- Max nozzle temperature280 °C vs 350 °C+25%
- Number of supported materials7 vs 11+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Delta | Delta |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 200 mm/s | 200 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.35 mm | 0.35 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 280 °C | 350 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.7 mm | 0.7 mm |
| Supported materials | WASP — TPU, TPE, PP, other — PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS | WASP — ABS, HIPS, NYLON CARBON, PMMA, other — PLA, PETG, PC, PC+ABS, PPS, PVA, ASA |
| Number of supported materials | 7 | 11 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 120 °C | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Max chamber temperature | 70 °C | 70 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 7″ | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 850 mm | 850 mm |
| Depth | 770 mm | 770 mm |
| Height | 1,950 mm | 1,950 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 95 kg |
