- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 4070 FX vs 4070 HDP
WASP 4070 FX vs WASP 4070 HDP
What 4070 FX does better (3) and where 4070 HDP wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
4070 FX4070 HDP
| 4070 FX | 4070 HDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,950 mm | 1,950 mm | = |
| Width | 850 mm | 850 mm | = |
| Depth | 770 mm | 770 mm | = |
| Weight | 95 kg | 95 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 4070 FX better than 4070 HDP?
- Finest layer height0.05 mm vs 0.2 mm4×
- Max print speed200 mm/s vs 150 mm/s+33%
- Max chamber temperature70 °C vs 50 °C+40%
Why is 4070 HDP better than 4070 FX?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · 4070 FX: Yes
- Number of supported materials7 vs 11+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Delta | Delta |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 200 mm/s | 150 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.2 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.35 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 280 °C | 280 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.7 mm | — |
| Supported materials | WASP — TPU, TPE, PP, other — PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS | WASP — ABS, HIPS, NYLON CARBON, PMMA, other — PLA, PETG, PC, PC+ABS, PPS, PVA, ASA |
| Number of supported materials | 7 | 11 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 120 °C | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Max chamber temperature | 70 °C | 50 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 7″ | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 850 mm | 850 mm |
| Depth | 770 mm | 770 mm |
| Height | 1,950 mm | 1,950 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 95 kg |
