- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Lisa X vs 4070 FX
Sinterit Lisa X vs WASP 4070 FX
What Lisa X does better (1) and where 4070 FX wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Lisa X4070 FX
| Lisa X | 4070 FX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,200 mm | 1,950 mm | −750 mm |
| Width | 650 mm | 850 mm | −200 mm |
| Depth | 610 mm | 770 mm | −160 mm |
| Weight | 145 kg | 95 kg | +50 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Lisa X better than 4070 FX?
- Max chamber temperature210 °C vs 70 °C3×
Why is 4070 FX better than Lisa X?
- Finest layer height0.075 mm vs 0.05 mm+50%
- Weight145 kg vs 95 kg+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | SLS (powder) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Delta |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 130 mm | — |
| Build depth (Y) | 180 mm | — |
| Build height (Z) | 340 mm | — |
| Build volume | 8 L | — |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 200 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.075 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.35 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 280 °C |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.7 mm |
| Supported materials | — | WASP — TPU, TPE, PP, other — PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | — | 7 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | — | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | — | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | — | 120 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | — | Yes |
| Max chamber temperature | 210 °C | 70 °C |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD size | 9″ | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | — | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 650 mm | 850 mm |
| Depth | 610 mm | 770 mm |
| Height | 1,200 mm | 1,950 mm |
| Weight | 145 kg | 95 kg |
