- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Pharaoh XD40 vs BIG-60 V3
Mass Portal Pharaoh XD40 vs Modix3D BIG-60 V3
What Pharaoh XD40 does better (2) and where BIG-60 V3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Build volume8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pharaoh XD40BIG-60 V3
| Pharaoh XD40 | BIG-60 V3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,100 mm | 906 mm | +194 mm |
| Width | 535 mm | 1,060 mm | −525 mm |
| Depth | 588 mm | 1,356 mm | −768 mm |
| Weight | 61 kg | 120 kg | −59 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pharaoh XD40 better than BIG-60 V3?
- EthernetYes · BIG-60 V3: No
- Weight61 kg vs 120 kg+97%
Why is BIG-60 V3 better than Pharaoh XD40?
- Build volume64 L vs 237.6 L3.7×
- Build height (Z)400 mm vs 660 mm+65%
- Build width (X)400 mm vs 600 mm+50%
- Build depth (Y)400 mm vs 600 mm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Delivered as | Fully assembled | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 400 mm | 600 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 400 mm | 600 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 400 mm | 660 mm |
| Build volume | 64 L | 237.6 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, PLA, PET, PVA, HIPS | — |
| Number of supported materials | 5 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Screen size | 7″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 535 mm | 1,060 mm |
| Depth | 588 mm | 1,356 mm |
| Height | 1,100 mm | 906 mm |
| Weight | 61 kg | 120 kg |
