How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. LUGO G3 vs i-Fast

LUGOLABS LUGO G3 vs QIDI i-Fast

What LUGO G3 does better (2) and where i-Fast wins (5) — every spec side by side.

LUGOLABS LUGO G3
LUGOLABS · 2022LUGO G3
3.9Score
2 advantages≈ $2,600
vs
QIDI i-Fast
QIDI · 2021i-Fast
4.8Score
5 advantages≈ $1,900
Higher score
5.9Speed3.6
2.4Build volume5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

LUGO G3i-Fast
457 × 532370710 × 670510
LUGO G3i-FastDifference
Height532 mm670 mm−138 mm
Width457 mm710 mm−253 mm
Depth370 mm510 mm−140 mm
Weight15 kg33 kg−18 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is LUGO G3 better than i-Fast?

  1. Max print speed200 mm/s vs 150 mm/s+33%
  2. Weight15 kg vs 33 kg2.2×

Why is i-Fast better than LUGO G3?

  1. Build volume5.6 L vs 26.4 L4.7×
  2. Build height (Z)180 mm vs 320 mm+78%
  3. Max nozzle temperature285 °C vs 350 °C+23%
  4. Build width (X)190 mm vs 330 mm+74%
  5. Build depth (Y)165 mm vs 250 mm+52%
Specifications

Side by side

LUGOLABS LUGO G3LUGOLABS LUGO G3≈ $2,6003.9
QIDI i-FastQIDI i-Fast≈ $1,9004.8
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Build volume
Build width (X)190 mm330 mm
Build depth (Y)165 mm250 mm
Build height (Z)180 mm320 mm
Build volume5.6 L26.4 L
Speed
Max print speed200 mm/s150 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.05 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature285 °C350 °C
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Nozzles22
Filament diameter1.75 mm—
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Max bed temperature130 °C—
Connectivity & control
Connectivity—Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
Ethernet—Yes
USB—Yes
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width457 mm710 mm
Depth370 mm510 mm
Height532 mm670 mm
Weight15 kg33 kg
Rated power—700 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare