- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- M1 vs Cube One
Geeetech M1 vs Renkforce Cube One
What M1 does better (4) and where Cube One wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M1Cube One
| M1 | Cube One | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 298 mm | 254 mm | +44 mm |
| Width | 279 mm | 208 mm | +71 mm |
| Depth | 200 mm | 206 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.9 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M1 better than Cube One?
- Build volume1.1 L vs 0.5 L2.2×
- Build height (Z)110 mm vs 80 mm+38%
- Build width (X)100 mm vs 80 mm+25%
- Build depth (Y)100 mm vs 80 mm+25%
Why is Cube One better than M1?
- Weight3 kg vs 2.9 kg+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 100 mm | 80 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 100 mm | 80 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 110 mm | 80 mm |
| Build volume | 1.1 L | 0.5 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 250 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.2 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Direct-drive extruder | Yes | — |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.7 mm |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | — | PLA |
| Number of supported materials | — | 1 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | — | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 60 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 279 mm | 208 mm |
| Depth | 200 mm | 206 mm |
| Height | 298 mm | 254 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.9 kg |
