- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Guider IIs vs X3
Flashforge Guider IIs vs Zaxe X3
What Guider IIs does better (5) and where X3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Build volume5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Guider IIsX3
| Guider IIs | X3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 561 mm | 530 mm | +31 mm |
| Width | 549 mm | 410 mm | +139 mm |
| Depth | 490 mm | 583 mm | −93 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Guider IIs better than X3?
- Build volume21 L vs 12.7 L+65%
- Build height (Z)300 mm vs 250 mm+20%
- Number of supported materials7 vs 5+40%
- Build width (X)280 mm vs 220 mm+27%
- Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 230 mm+9%
Why is X3 better than Guider IIs?
X3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 280 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 250 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 21 L | 12.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.4 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLA | PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon, Wood |
| Number of supported materials | 7 | 5 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 549 mm | 410 mm |
| Depth | 490 mm | 583 mm |
| Height | 561 mm | 530 mm |
| Weight | 30 kg | — |
