- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender-3 S1 Pro vs Guider IIs
Creality Ender-3 S1 Pro vs Flashforge Guider IIs
What Ender-3 S1 Pro does better (1) and where Guider IIs wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Build volume8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender-3 S1 ProGuider IIs
| Ender-3 S1 Pro | Guider IIs | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 625 mm | 561 mm | +64 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 549 mm | −59 mm |
| Depth | 455 mm | 490 mm | −35 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 30 kg | −21.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender-3 S1 Pro better than Guider IIs?
- Weight8.6 kg vs 30 kg3.5×
Why is Guider IIs better than Ender-3 S1 Pro?
- Build volume13.1 L vs 21 L+60%
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · Ender-3 S1 Pro: Yes
- Wi-FiNo · Ender-3 S1 Pro: Yes
- Number of supported materials1 vs 77×
- Build height (Z)270 mm vs 300 mm+11%
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 280 mm+27%
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 250 mm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | — | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 280 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 250 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 270 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 13.1 L | 21 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | TPU | ABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 7 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 549 mm |
| Depth | 455 mm | 490 mm |
| Height | 625 mm | 561 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 30 kg |
| Rated power | 350 W | — |
