How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Guider IIs V2 vs mCreate 2.0

Flashforge Guider IIs V2 vs Makeblock mCreate 2.0

What Guider IIs V2 does better (5) and where mCreate 2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Flashforge Guider IIs V2
Flashforge · 2021Guider IIs V2
5.5Score
5 advantages≈ $1,700
Higher score
vs
Makeblock mCreate 2.0
Makeblock · 2021mCreate 2.0
5.4Score
0 advantages≈ $1,000
4.1Speed4.1
8.1Build volume6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Guider IIs V2mCreate 2.0
549 × 561490445 × 485550
Guider IIs V2mCreate 2.0Difference
Height561 mm485 mm+76 mm
Width549 mm445 mm+104 mm
Depth490 mm550 mm−60 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Guider IIs V2 better than mCreate 2.0?

  1. Build volume21 L vs 14.3 L+47%
  2. Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · mCreate 2.0: No
  3. Number of supported materials7 vs 32.3×
  4. Build width (X)280 mm vs 220 mm+27%
  5. Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 220 mm+14%

Why is mCreate 2.0 better than Guider IIs V2?

mCreate 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Build volume
Build width (X)280 mm220 mm
Build depth (Y)250 mm220 mm
Build height (Z)300 mm295 mm
Build volume21 L14.3 L
Speed
Max print speed150 mm/s150 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height0.1 mm—
Thickest layer height0.4 mm—
Extruder & hotend
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Toolheads1—
Nozzles1—
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLAPLA, TPU, PVA
Number of supported materials73
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)YesNo
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USB—
Wi-FiYes—
EthernetYes—
USBYes—
SD cardNo—
BluetoothNo—
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width549 mm445 mm
Depth490 mm550 mm
Height561 mm485 mm
Weight30 kg—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare