How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X133 vs Slash Pro UDP

EPAX X133 vs Uniz Slash Pro UDP

What X133 does better (3) and where Slash Pro UDP wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X133
EPAX · 2020X133
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ $3,300
vs
Uniz Slash Pro UDP
Uniz · 2020Slash Pro UDP
9.6Score
1 advantage≈ $5,500
Higher score
5.6Print quality7.5
8.9Build volume7.8
3.3Ease of use6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

X133Slash Pro UDP
457 × 787381350 × 730400
X133Slash Pro UDPDifference
Height787 mm730 mm+57 mm
Width457 mm350 mm+107 mm
Depth381 mm400 mm−19 mm
Weight41 kg18 kg+23 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X133 better than Slash Pro UDP?

  1. Build volume19.3 L vs 9.2 L2.1×
  2. Build width (X)292 mm vs 192 mm+52%
  3. Build depth (Y)165 mm vs 120 mm+38%

Why is Slash Pro UDP better than X133?

  1. Weight41 kg vs 18 kg2.3×
Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X133EPAX X133≈ $3,3007.2
Uniz Slash Pro UDPUniz Slash Pro UDP≈ $5,5009.6
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)292 mm192 mm
Build depth (Y)165 mm120 mm
Build height (Z)400 mm400 mm
Build volume19.3 L9.2 L
Speed
Resin print speed—600 mm/h
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm0.01 mm
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class4K—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size3.5″—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width457 mm350 mm
Depth381 mm400 mm
Height787 mm730 mm
Weight41 kg18 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare