How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X133 vs Slash 2

EPAX X133 vs Uniz Slash 2

What X133 does better (4) and where Slash 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X133
EPAX · 2020X133
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $3,300
vs
Uniz Slash 2
Uniz · 2020Slash 2
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $3,500
Higher score
5.6Print quality7.5
8.9Build volume4.6
3.3Ease of use6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

X133Slash 2
457 × 787381350 × 530400
X133Slash 2Difference
Height787 mm530 mm+257 mm
Width457 mm350 mm+107 mm
Depth381 mm400 mm−19 mm
Weight41 kg15 kg+26 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X133 better than Slash 2?

  1. Build volume19.3 L vs 4.6 L4.2×
  2. Build height (Z)400 mm vs 200 mm2×
  3. Build width (X)292 mm vs 192 mm+52%
  4. Build depth (Y)165 mm vs 120 mm+38%

Why is Slash 2 better than X133?

  1. Weight41 kg vs 15 kg2.7×
Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X133EPAX X133≈ $3,3007.2
Uniz Slash 2Uniz Slash 2≈ $3,5008.1
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)292 mm192 mm
Build depth (Y)165 mm120 mm
Build height (Z)400 mm200 mm
Build volume19.3 L4.6 L
Speed
Resin print speed—200 mm/h
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm0.01 mm
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class4K—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size3.5″—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width457 mm350 mm
Depth381 mm400 mm
Height787 mm530 mm
Weight41 kg15 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare