How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X133 vs Slash Pro

EPAX X133 vs Uniz Slash Pro

What X133 does better (4) and where Slash Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X133
EPAX · 2020X133
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $3,300
vs
Uniz Slash Pro
Uniz · 2020Slash Pro
9.1Score
1 advantage≈ $4,500
Higher score
5.6Print quality5.8
8.9Build volume7.8
3.3Ease of use6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

X133Slash Pro
457 × 787381350 × 730400
X133Slash ProDifference
Height787 mm730 mm+57 mm
Width457 mm350 mm+107 mm
Depth381 mm400 mm−19 mm
Weight41 kg18 kg+23 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X133 better than Slash Pro?

  1. Build volume19.3 L vs 9.2 L2.1×
  2. Finest layer height0.01 mm vs 0.02 mm2×
  3. Build width (X)292 mm vs 192 mm+52%
  4. Build depth (Y)165 mm vs 120 mm+38%

Why is Slash Pro better than X133?

  1. Weight41 kg vs 18 kg2.3×
Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X133EPAX X133≈ $3,3007.2
Uniz Slash ProUniz Slash Pro≈ $4,5009.1
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)292 mm192 mm
Build depth (Y)165 mm120 mm
Build height (Z)400 mm400 mm
Build volume19.3 L9.2 L
Speed
Resin print speed—200 mm/h
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm0.02 mm
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class4K—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size3.5″—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width457 mm350 mm
Depth381 mm400 mm
Height787 mm730 mm
Weight41 kg18 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare