How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X10 vs Hunter S

EPAX X10 vs Flashforge Hunter S

What X10 does better (4) and where Hunter S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X10
EPAX · 2020X10
5.3Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
vs
Flashforge Hunter S
Flashforge · 2023Hunter S
4.7Score
0 advantages
7.5Build volume3.4
3.3Ease of use7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

X10Hunter S
360 × 530380360 × 560320
X10Hunter SDifference
Height530 mm560 mm−30 mm
Width360 mm360 mm=
Depth380 mm320 mm+60 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X10 better than Hunter S?

  1. Build volume7.3 L vs 2.1 L3.5×
  2. Build height (Z)250 mm vs 180 mm+39%
  3. Build depth (Y)135 mm vs 81 mm+67%
  4. Build width (X)216 mm vs 144 mm+50%

Why is Hunter S better than X10?

Hunter S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X10EPAX X10≈ $1,2005.3
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)DLP (resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)216 mm144 mm
Build depth (Y)135 mm81 mm
Build height (Z)250 mm180 mm
Build volume7.3 L2.1 L
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class2K—
XY resolution45 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size3.5″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width360 mm360 mm
Depth380 mm320 mm
Height530 mm560 mm
Weight23 kg—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare