- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Stellar III vs Form 4L
Emake3D Stellar III vs Formlabs Form 4L
What Stellar III does better (0) and where Form 4L wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Build volume8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Stellar IIIForm 4L
| Stellar III | Form 4L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,290 mm | 794 mm | +496 mm |
| Width | 505 mm | 664 mm | −159 mm |
| Depth | 760 mm | 528 mm | +232 mm |
| Weight | 152 kg | 58.5 kg | +93.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Stellar III better than Form 4L?
Stellar III has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Form 4L better than Stellar III?
- Build volume0.9 L vs 24.2 L26.9×
- Build height (Z)35 mm vs 350 mm10×
- Finest layer height0.05 mm vs 0.025 mm2×
- Weight152 kg vs 58.5 kg2.6×
- Build width (X)211 mm vs 353 mm+67%
- Build depth (Y)118 mm vs 196 mm+66%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | MSLA (LCD resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 211 mm | 353 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 118 mm | 196 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 35 mm | 350 mm |
| Build volume | 0.9 L | 24.2 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | 30 mm/h | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.025 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.2 mm |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | — | Yes |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| XY resolution | 19 µm | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | — | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | — | Yes |
| Camera resolution | — | 5 MP |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 505 mm | 664 mm |
| Depth | 760 mm | 528 mm |
| Height | 1,290 mm | 794 mm |
| Weight | 152 kg | 58.5 kg |
