How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stellar 2 vs X156

Emake3D Stellar 2 vs EPAX X156

What Stellar 2 does better (4) and where X156 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Emake3D Stellar 2
Emake3D · 2024Stellar 2
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $4,000
Higher score
vs
EPAX X156
EPAX · 2020X156
7.6Score
3 advantages≈ $2,800
3.8Print quality5.6
9.1Build volume9.3
8.5Ease of use3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stellar 2X156
490 × 1,645.5438.5508 × 787431
Stellar 2X156Difference
Height1,645.5 mm787 mm+858.5 mm
Width490 mm508 mm−18 mm
Depth438.5 mm431 mm+7.5 mm
Weight95 kg45 kg+50 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stellar 2 better than X156?

  1. LCD resolution class8K vs 4K2×
  2. Screen size5″ vs 3.5″+43%
  3. Build width (X)353 mm vs 345 mm+2%
  4. Build depth (Y)198 mm vs 194 mm+2%

Why is X156 better than Stellar 2?

  1. Finest layer height0.025 mm vs 0.01 mm2.5×
  2. Weight95 kg vs 45 kg2.1×
  3. Build height (Z)380 mm vs 400 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Emake3D Stellar 2Emake3D Stellar 2≈ $4,0008.3
EPAX X156EPAX X156≈ $2,8007.6
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered as—Fully assembled
Build volume
Build width (X)353 mm345 mm
Build depth (Y)198 mm194 mm
Build height (Z)380 mm400 mm
Build volume26.6 L26.8 L
Speed
Resin print speed90 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.025 mm0.01 mm
Thickest layer height0.1 mm—
Enclosure
Max chamber temperature40 °C—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class8K4K
LCD size16″—
XY resolution46 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBEthernet, USB
Wi-FiYes—
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size5″3.5″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width490 mm508 mm
Depth438 mm431 mm
Height1,646 mm787 mm
Weight95 kg45 kg
Rated power250 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare