- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Stellar 2 vs X133
Emake3D Stellar 2 vs EPAX X133
What Stellar 2 does better (5) and where X133 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Stellar 2X133
| Stellar 2 | X133 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,645.5 mm | 787 mm | +858.5 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 457 mm | +33 mm |
| Depth | 438.5 mm | 381 mm | +57.5 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 41 kg | +54 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Stellar 2 better than X133?
- LCD resolution class8K vs 4K2×
- Build volume26.6 L vs 19.3 L+38%
- Screen size5″ vs 3.5″+43%
- Build width (X)353 mm vs 292 mm+21%
- Build depth (Y)198 mm vs 165 mm+20%
Why is X133 better than Stellar 2?
- Finest layer height0.025 mm vs 0.01 mm2.5×
- Weight95 kg vs 41 kg2.3×
- Build height (Z)380 mm vs 400 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | MSLA (LCD resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Delivered as | — | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 353 mm | 292 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 198 mm | 165 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 380 mm | 400 mm |
| Build volume | 26.6 L | 19.3 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | 90 mm/h | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.025 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.1 mm | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Max chamber temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD resolution class | 8K | 4K |
| LCD size | 16″ | — |
| XY resolution | 46 µm | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 5″ | 3.5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 457 mm |
| Depth | 438 mm | 381 mm |
| Height | 1,646 mm | 787 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 41 kg |
| Rated power | 250 W | — |
