- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Stellar 2 vs Stellar III
Emake3D Stellar 2 vs Emake3D Stellar III
What Stellar 2 does better (7) and where Stellar III wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Speed2.4
3.8Print quality6.0
9.1Build volume2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Stellar 2Stellar III
| Stellar 2 | Stellar III | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,645.5 mm | 1,290 mm | +355.5 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 505 mm | −15 mm |
| Depth | 438.5 mm | 760 mm | −321.5 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 152 kg | −57 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Stellar 2 better than Stellar III?
- Build volume26.6 L vs 0.9 L29.6×
- Resin print speed90 mm/h vs 30 mm/h3×
- Build height (Z)380 mm vs 35 mm10.9×
- Finest layer height0.025 mm vs 0.05 mm2×
- Build depth (Y)198 mm vs 118 mm+68%
- Build width (X)353 mm vs 211 mm+67%
- Weight95 kg vs 152 kg+60%
Why is Stellar III better than Stellar 2?
- XY resolution46 µm vs 19 µm2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | MSLA (LCD resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 353 mm | 211 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 198 mm | 118 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 380 mm | 35 mm |
| Build volume | 26.6 L | 0.9 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | 90 mm/h | 30 mm/h |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.025 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.1 mm |
| Enclosure | ||
| Max chamber temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD resolution class | 8K | — |
| LCD size | 16″ | — |
| XY resolution | 46 µm | 19 µm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 5″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 505 mm |
| Depth | 438 mm | 760 mm |
| Height | 1,646 mm | 1,290 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 152 kg |
| Rated power | 250 W | — |
