- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- MegaLabs M1 vs Stellar 2
Emake3D MegaLabs M1 vs Emake3D Stellar 2
What MegaLabs M1 does better (5) and where Stellar 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Speed5.8
9.7Build volume9.1
9.5Ease of use8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
MegaLabs M1Stellar 2
| MegaLabs M1 | Stellar 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,750 mm | 1,645.5 mm | +104.5 mm |
| Width | 780 mm | 490 mm | +290 mm |
| Depth | 560 mm | 438.5 mm | +121.5 mm |
| Weight | 158 kg | 95 kg | +63 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MegaLabs M1 better than Stellar 2?
- Build volume87.9 L vs 26.6 L3.3×
- Build height (Z)550 mm vs 380 mm+45%
- Build depth (Y)300 mm vs 198 mm+52%
- Build width (X)533 mm vs 353 mm+51%
- Screen size7″ vs 5″+40%
Why is Stellar 2 better than MegaLabs M1?
- Resin print speed30 mm/h vs 90 mm/h3×
- Finest layer height0.1 mm vs 0.025 mm4×
- Weight158 kg vs 95 kg+66%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | DLP (resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 533 mm | 353 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 300 mm | 198 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 550 mm | 380 mm |
| Build volume | 87.9 L | 26.6 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | 30 mm/h | 90 mm/h |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.025 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Enclosure | ||
| Max chamber temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD resolution class | — | 8K |
| LCD size | — | 16″ |
| XY resolution | — | 46 µm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 7″ | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 780 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 560 mm | 438 mm |
| Height | 1,750 mm | 1,646 mm |
| Weight | 158 kg | 95 kg |
| Rated power | 600 W | 250 W |
