- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- XFAB 3500HD vs Hunter S
DWS XFAB 3500HD vs Flashforge Hunter S
What XFAB 3500HD does better (3) and where Hunter S wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Build volume3.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
XFAB 3500HDHunter S
| XFAB 3500HD | Hunter S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 880 mm | 560 mm | +320 mm |
| Width | 400 mm | 360 mm | +40 mm |
| Depth | 606 mm | 320 mm | +286 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XFAB 3500HD better than Hunter S?
- Build volume4.6 L vs 2.1 L2.2×
- Build depth (Y)160 mm vs 81 mm+98%
- Build width (X)160 mm vs 144 mm+11%
Why is Hunter S better than XFAB 3500HD?
Hunter S has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | SLA (laser resin) | DLP (resin) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 160 mm | 144 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 160 mm | 81 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 180 mm | 180 mm |
| Build volume | 4.6 L | 2.1 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.1 mm | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 400 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 606 mm | 320 mm |
| Height | 880 mm | 560 mm |
| Weight | 42 kg | — |
| Rated power | 160 W | — |
