- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- DX vs 2040 Pro
CreatBot DX vs WASP 2040 Pro
What DX does better (1) and where 2040 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DX2040 Pro
| DX | 2040 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 570 mm | 870 mm | −300 mm |
| Width | 420 mm | 490 mm | −70 mm |
| Depth | 380 mm | 440 mm | −60 mm |
| Weight | 25 kg | 25 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DX better than 2040 Pro?
- Number of supported materials13 vs 43.2×
Why is 2040 Pro better than DX?
- Max print speed200 mm/s vs 500 mm/s2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Delta |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 300 mm | — |
| Build depth (Y) | 250 mm | — |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | — |
| Build volume | 22.5 L | — |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 200 mm/s | 500 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 350 °C | 350 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Nozzle material | — | hardened steel |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, Carbon Fiber, Wood, Nylon, PC, PTEG, HIPS, PP, Flexible, TPU, PVA, etc. | PLA, PETG, ABS, PA carbon |
| Number of supported materials | 13 | 4 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | SD card |
| USB | Yes | — |
| SD card | — | Yes |
| Screen size | 4.3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 420 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 380 mm | 440 mm |
| Height | 570 mm | 870 mm |
| Weight | 25 kg | 25 kg |
| Rated power | — | 600 W |
