How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Ender 3 V2 Neo vs 4070 FX

Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs WASP 4070 FX

What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (1) and where 4070 FX wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo
Creality · 2022Ender 3 V2 Neo
3.9Score
1 advantage
vs
WASP 4070 FX
WASP · 20224070 FX
6.2Score
4 advantages≈ $15,000
Higher score
3.5Speed5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Ender 3 V2 Neo4070 FX
438 × 472424850 × 1,950770
Ender 3 V2 Neo4070 FXDifference
Height472 mm1,950 mm−1,478 mm
Width438 mm850 mm−412 mm
Depth424 mm770 mm−346 mm
Weight7.8 kg95 kg−87.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than 4070 FX?

  1. Weight7.8 kg vs 95 kg12.2×

Why is 4070 FX better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?

  1. Max print speed120 mm/s vs 200 mm/s+67%
  2. Wi-FiNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
  3. Number of supported materials3 vs 72.3×
  4. EthernetNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

WASP 4070 FXWASP 4070 FX≈ $15,0006.2
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Motion system—Delta
Build volume
Build width (X)220 mm—
Build depth (Y)220 mm—
Build height (Z)250 mm—
Build volume12.1 L—
Speed
Max print speed120 mm/s200 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.05 mm
Thickest layer height—0.35 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—280 °C
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.7 mm
Filament diameter1.75 mm—
Supported materialsPLA, PETG, ABSWASP — TPU, TPE, PP, other — PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS
Number of supported materials37
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Max bed temperature—120 °C
Enclosure
Actively heated chamber—Yes
Max chamber temperature—70 °C
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSB, SD cardWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiNoYes
EthernetNoYes
USBYesYes
SD cardYes—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—7″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width438 mm850 mm
Depth424 mm770 mm
Height472 mm1,950 mm
Weight7.8 kg95 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare