- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender 3 V2 Neo vs 3D DigiLab 3D45
Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Dremel 3D DigiLab 3D45
What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (4) and where 3D DigiLab 3D45 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Build volume2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender 3 V2 Neo3D DigiLab 3D45
| Ender 3 V2 Neo | 3D DigiLab 3D45 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 406 mm | +66 mm |
| Width | 438 mm | 515 mm | −77 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 394 mm | +30 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 19.4 kg | −11.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than 3D DigiLab 3D45?
- Build volume12.1 L vs 6.7 L+81%
- Build height (Z)250 mm vs 170 mm+47%
- Weight7.8 kg vs 19.4 kg2.5×
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 155 mm+42%
Why is 3D DigiLab 3D45 better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Wi-FiNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- EthernetNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 255 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 255 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 155 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 170 mm |
| Build volume | 12.1 L | 6.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, ABS | — |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 438 mm | 515 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 394 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 406 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 19.4 kg |
