- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- CR-M4 vs Super Racer
Creality CR-M4 vs FLSUN Super Racer
What CR-M4 does better (6) and where Super Racer wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Speed3.5
7.2Build volume8.1
Why is CR-M4 better than Super Racer?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · Super Racer: No
- Wi-FiYes · Super Racer: No
- EthernetYes · Super Racer: No
- Number of supported materials5 vs 3+67%
- Build depth (Y)450 mm vs 390 mm+15%
- Build width (X)450 mm vs 440 mm+2%
Why is Super Racer better than CR-M4?
- Build volume95.2 L vs 164.7 L+73%
- Build height (Z)470 mm vs 960 mm2×
- Max print speed120 mm/s vs 150 mm/s+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | CoreXY / XY-head | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 450 mm | 440 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 450 mm | 390 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 470 mm | 960 mm |
| Build volume | 95.2 L | 164.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | 150 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.35 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Direct-drive extruder | Yes | — |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, PA, PETG, PLA, TPU | PLA, ABS, PETG |
| Number of supported materials | 5 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | Yes | — |
| Chamber light | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Screen size | 4.3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Power-loss recovery | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 655 mm | — |
| Depth | 700 mm | — |
| Height | 865 mm | — |
| Weight | 22.5 kg | — |
| Rated power | 800 W | 300 W |
