- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- WLAN vs da Vinci Junior Pro X+
Bresser WLAN vs XYZprinting da Vinci Junior Pro X+
What WLAN does better (2) and where da Vinci Junior Pro X+ wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Build volume2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
WLANda Vinci Junior Pro X+
| WLAN | da Vinci Junior Pro X+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 405 mm | 380 mm | +25 mm |
| Width | 380 mm | 420 mm | −40 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 430 mm | −30 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WLAN better than da Vinci Junior Pro X+?
- EthernetYes · da Vinci Junior Pro X+: No
- Number of supported materials3 vs 2+50%
Why is da Vinci Junior Pro X+ better than WLAN?
- Build volume3.4 L vs 5.4 L+59%
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 175 mm+17%
- Build width (X)150 mm vs 175 mm+17%
- Build depth (Y)150 mm vs 175 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | — | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 150 mm | 175 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 150 mm | 175 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 175 mm |
| Build volume | 3.4 L | 5.4 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.01 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, PLA, Wood | PETG, PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 2 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Screen size | — | 2.6″ |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 380 mm | 420 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 430 mm |
| Height | 405 mm | 380 mm |
| Weight | — | 15 kg |
