- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- WLAN vs A10T
Bresser WLAN vs Geeetech A10T
What WLAN does better (1) and where A10T wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WLANA10T
| WLAN | A10T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 405 mm | 485 mm | −80 mm |
| Width | 380 mm | 478 mm | −98 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 413 mm | −13 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WLAN better than A10T?
- Number of supported materials3 vs 2+50%
Why is A10T better than WLAN?
- Build volume3.4 L vs 12.1 L3.6×
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 250 mm+67%
- Build width (X)150 mm vs 220 mm+47%
- Build depth (Y)150 mm vs 220 mm+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | — | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Delivered as | — | Partially assembled |
| All-metal frame | — | Yes |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 150 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 150 mm | 220 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 3.4 L | 12.1 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 60 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Direct-drive extruder | — | No |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, PLA, Wood | ABS, PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 2 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | — | 100 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Filament runout sensor | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 380 mm | 478 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 413 mm |
| Height | 405 mm | 485 mm |
| Weight | — | 8 kg |
| Rated power | — | 350 W |
