- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX² vs Ender 3 V2 Neo
Bresser T-REX² vs Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo
What T-REX² does better (1) and where Ender 3 V2 Neo wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Speed3.7
2.6Build volume4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
T-REX²Ender 3 V2 Neo
| T-REX² | Ender 3 V2 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 403 mm | 472 mm | −69 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 438 mm | −78 mm |
| Depth | 526 mm | 424 mm | +102 mm |
| Weight | 15 kg | 7.8 kg | +7.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-REX² better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Wi-FiYes · Ender 3 V2 Neo: No
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than T-REX²?
- Build volume4.4 L vs 12.1 L2.7×
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 250 mm+67%
- Max print speed100 mm/s vs 120 mm/s+20%
- Weight15 kg vs 7.8 kg+92%
- Number of supported materials2 vs 3+50%
- Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 220 mm+49%
- Build width (X)200 mm vs 220 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 200 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 220 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 4.4 L | 12.1 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 100 mm/s | 120 mm/s |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | PLA, PETG, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 360 mm | 438 mm |
| Depth | 526 mm | 424 mm |
| Height | 403 mm | 472 mm |
| Weight | 15 kg | 7.8 kg |
