- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Kobra 3 vs HP3DX200E
Anycubic Kobra 3 vs Hamlet HP3DX200E
What Kobra 3 does better (2) and where HP3DX200E wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Kobra 3 better than HP3DX200E?
- Wi-FiYes · HP3DX200E: No
- TouchscreenYes · HP3DX200E: No
Why is HP3DX200E better than Kobra 3?
- Built-in cameraNo · Kobra 3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | — |
| Delivered as | Partially assembled | — |
| All-metal frame | Yes | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 250 mm | — |
| Build depth (Y) | 250 mm | — |
| Build height (Z) | 260 mm | — |
| Build volume | 16.2 L | — |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 250 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.3 mm | — |
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 300 °C | — |
| Direct-drive extruder | Yes | — |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Nozzle material | brass | — |
| Swappable nozzle / hotend | Yes | — |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | — |
| Supported materials | PETG, PLA, TPU | PETG, ABS, PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Multi-colour | ||
| Multi-colour printing | Yes | — |
| Max colours / materials | 4 | — |
| Multi-colour system | ACE Pro | — |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 110 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB | SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| SD card | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Screen size | 4.3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | Yes |
| Filament runout sensor | Yes | — |
| Power-loss recovery | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 453 mm | — |
| Depth | 504 mm | — |
| Height | 483 mm | — |
| Weight | 9.2 kg | — |
| Rated power | 400 W | — |
