- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- HTX vs Peek-250
3DLabs HTX vs CreatBot Peek-250
What HTX does better (5) and where Peek-250 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is HTX better than Peek-250?
- Build volume31.5 L vs 18.8 L+68%
- Max nozzle temperature500 °C vs 480 °C+4%
- Max bed temperature220 °C vs 200 °C+10%
- Build width (X)350 mm vs 250 mm+40%
- Build depth (Y)300 mm vs 250 mm+20%
Why is Peek-250 better than HTX?
- Number of supported materials6 vs 162.7×
- Max chamber temperature100 °C vs 200 °C2×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 350 mm | 250 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 300 mm | 250 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 31.5 L | 18.8 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 180 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.04 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 500 °C | 480 °C |
| Direct-drive extruder | — | Yes |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Supported nozzle sizes (mm) | — | 0.4, 0.6 |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, ASA, PC, PEEK, PEI, PEKK | PLA, ABS, ASA, PC, Nylon, PETG, PVDF, Carbon Fiber, PET-CF, PET-GF, UltraPA, UltraPA-GF, UltraPA-CF, PPSU, PEEK, PEKK |
| Number of supported materials | 6 | 16 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 220 °C | 200 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Max chamber temperature | 100 °C | 200 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Ethernet, USB | USB |
| Ethernet | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 7″ | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Filament runout sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Power-loss recovery | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 630 mm |
| Depth | — | 555 mm |
| Height | — | 815 mm |
| Weight | — | 100 kg |
| Rated power | — | 2,500 W |
