- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 4070 HDP vs 4070 ZX
WASP 4070 HDP vs WASP 4070 ZX
What 4070 HDP does better (0) and where 4070 ZX wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
4070 HDP4070 ZX
| 4070 HDP | 4070 ZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,950 mm | 1,950 mm | = |
| Width | 850 mm | 850 mm | = |
| Depth | 770 mm | 770 mm | = |
| Weight | 95 kg | 95 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 4070 HDP better than 4070 ZX?
4070 HDP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 4070 ZX better than 4070 HDP?
- Finest layer height0.2 mm vs 0.05 mm4×
- Max print speed150 mm/s vs 200 mm/s+33%
- Max nozzle temperature280 °C vs 350 °C+25%
- Max chamber temperature50 °C vs 70 °C+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Delta | Delta |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 150 mm/s | 200 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.2 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.5 mm | 0.35 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 280 °C | 350 °C |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.7 mm |
| Supported materials | WASP — ABS, HIPS, NYLON CARBON, PMMA, other — PLA, PETG, PC, PC+ABS, PPS, PVA, ASA | WASP — ABS, HIPS, NYLON CARBON, PMMA, other — PLA, PETG, PC, PC+ABS, PPS, PVA, ASA |
| Number of supported materials | 11 | 11 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | Yes |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Max chamber temperature | 50 °C | 70 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 7″ | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 850 mm | 850 mm |
| Depth | 770 mm | 770 mm |
| Height | 1,950 mm | 1,950 mm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 95 kg |
