How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. 2.0 Modular F350 vs S5

Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350 vs UltiMaker S5

What 2.0 Modular F350 does better (3) and where S5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350
Snapmaker · 20212.0 Modular F350
3 advantages≈ $1,650
vs
UltiMaker S5
UltiMaker · 2018S5
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ $3,300
Higher score
9.3Build volume7.4

Why is 2.0 Modular F350 better than S5?

  1. Build volume37 L vs 23.8 L+55%
  2. Build height (Z)330 mm vs 240 mm+38%
  3. Build depth (Y)350 mm vs 300 mm+17%

Why is S5 better than 2.0 Modular F350?

  1. EthernetNo · 2.0 Modular F350: Yes
  2. Build width (X)320 mm vs 330 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

UltiMaker S5UltiMaker S5≈ $3,3009.1
General
Technology—FDM / FFF (filament)
Build volume
Build width (X)320 mm330 mm
Build depth (Y)350 mm300 mm
Build height (Z)330 mm240 mm
Build volume37 L23.8 L
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.02 mm
Thickest layer height—0.6 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—280 °C
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Supported nozzle sizes (mm)—0.25, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8
Toolheads—1
Nozzles—1
Filament diameter—2.85 mm
Supported materials—Optimized for PLA, Tough PLA, ABS, Nylon, CPE, CPE+, PC, PP, TPU 95A, PVA
Number of supported materials—10
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)—Yes
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Max bed temperature—140 °C
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetNoYes
USBYesYes
SD cardNo—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—4.7″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width—495 mm
Depth—780 mm
Height—585 mm
Weight—20.6 kg
Rated power320 W500 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare