How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X-SMART 3 vs Cube One

QIDI X-SMART 3 vs Renkforce Cube One

What X-SMART 3 does better (5) and where Cube One wins (1) — every spec side by side.

QIDI X-SMART 3
QIDI · 2023X-SMART 3
5.6Score
5 advantages≈ $420
Higher score
vs
Renkforce Cube One
Renkforce · 2023Cube One
1 advantage
2.9Build volume2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

X-SMART 3Cube One
370 × 397362208 × 254206
X-SMART 3Cube OneDifference
Height397 mm254 mm+143 mm
Width370 mm208 mm+162 mm
Depth362 mm206 mm+156 mm
Weight10.5 kg2.9 kg+7.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X-SMART 3 better than Cube One?

  1. Build volume5.5 L vs 0.5 L11×
  2. Build height (Z)170 mm vs 80 mm2.1×
  3. Number of supported materials6 vs 16×
  4. Build width (X)180 mm vs 80 mm2.2×
  5. Build depth (Y)180 mm vs 80 mm2.2×

Why is Cube One better than X-SMART 3?

  1. Weight10.5 kg vs 2.9 kg3.6×
Specifications

Side by side

QIDI X-SMART 3QIDI X-SMART 3≈ $4205.6
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Klipper firmwareYes—
Build volume
Build width (X)180 mm80 mm
Build depth (Y)180 mm80 mm
Build height (Z)170 mm80 mm
Build volume5.5 L0.5 L
Speed
Max print speed500 mm/s—
Max volumetric flow30 mm³/s—
Print quality
Automatic bed levellingYes—
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature280 °C—
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.7 mm
Supported nozzle sizes (mm)0.4, 0.8—
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsPLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, etc.PLA
Number of supported materials61
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Max bed temperature120 °C—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
Ethernet—No
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size4.3″—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width370 mm208 mm
Depth362 mm206 mm
Height397 mm254 mm
Weight10.5 kg2.9 kg
Rated power350 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare