- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- X-CF Pro vs Trident
QIDI X-CF Pro vs Voron Trident
What X-CF Pro does better (4) and where Trident wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is X-CF Pro better than Trident?
- Build volume22.5 L vs 15.6 L+44%
- Finest layer height0.05 mm vs 0.1 mm2×
- Build height (Z)300 mm vs 250 mm+20%
- Build width (X)300 mm vs 250 mm+20%
Why is Trident better than X-CF Pro?
- Max print speed60 mm/s vs 250 mm/s4.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | CoreXY / XY-head |
| Delivered as | — | Kit |
| All-metal frame | — | Yes |
| Klipper firmware | — | Yes |
| Open-source design | — | Yes |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 300 mm | 250 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 22.5 L | 15.6 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 60 mm/s | 250 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.1 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 350 °C | — |
| Direct-drive extruder | — | Yes |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PA12-CF, PLA, ABS, TPU, PETG, Nylon, PC | — |
| Number of supported materials | 7 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | — |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 120 °C | 120 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | — | Yes |
| Screen size | 5″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Silent stepper drivers | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 610 mm | — |
| Depth | 515 mm | — |
| Height | 678 mm | — |
| Weight | 32.5 kg | — |
