How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2 vs Arco

Gembird FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2 vs Phrozen Arco

What FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2 does better (0) and where Arco wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Gembird FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2
0 advantages≈ $510
vs
Phrozen Arco
Phrozen · 2025Arco
9.2Score
5 advantages≈ $780
Higher score
2.4Build volume8.7

Why is FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2 better than Arco?

FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Arco better than FF-3DP-1NA3-01 FFF WLAN Touchscreen 2?

  1. Build volume3.4 L vs 27 L7.9×
  2. Build height (Z)150 mm vs 300 mm2×
  3. Number of supported materials2 vs 73.5×
  4. Build width (X)150 mm vs 300 mm2×
  5. Build depth (Y)150 mm vs 300 mm2×
Specifications

Side by side

Phrozen ArcoPhrozen Arco≈ $7809.2
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Klipper firmware—Yes
Build volume
Build width (X)150 mm300 mm
Build depth (Y)150 mm300 mm
Build height (Z)150 mm300 mm
Build volume3.4 L27 L
Speed
Max print speed—1,000 mm/s
Max acceleration—40,000 mm/s²
Max volumetric flow—50 mm³/s
Print quality
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—300 °C
Supported materialsABS, PLAPLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, PET CF15, etc.
Number of supported materials27
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Max bed temperature—120 °C
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamber—No
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetNo—
USBYesYes
SD cardNo—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—5″
Touchscreen—Yes
Features
Built-in camera—Yes
Size & power
Width—491 mm
Depth—475 mm
Height—620 mm
Weight—22 kg
Rated power—1,700 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare