- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Mizar DIY vs Cube One
Geeetech Mizar DIY vs Renkforce Cube One
What Mizar DIY does better (5) and where Cube One wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mizar DIYCube One
| Mizar DIY | Cube One | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 445 mm | 254 mm | +191 mm |
| Width | 462 mm | 208 mm | +254 mm |
| Depth | 515 mm | 206 mm | +309 mm |
| Weight | 8.9 kg | 2.9 kg | +6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mizar DIY better than Cube One?
- Build volume12.6 L vs 0.5 L25.2×
- Build height (Z)260 mm vs 80 mm3.2×
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 80 mm2.8×
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 80 mm2.8×
- Number of supported materials5 vs 15×
Why is Cube One better than Mizar DIY?
- Weight8.9 kg vs 2.9 kg3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | — |
| Delivered as | Partially assembled | — |
| All-metal frame | Yes | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 80 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 80 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 260 mm | 80 mm |
| Build volume | 12.6 L | 0.5 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 60 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.7 mm |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, HIPS, PETG, PLA, PVA | PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 5 | 1 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 462 mm | 208 mm |
| Depth | 515 mm | 206 mm |
| Height | 445 mm | 254 mm |
| Weight | 8.9 kg | 2.9 kg |
