How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Guider IIs V2 vs 3DWOX 2X

Flashforge Guider IIs V2 vs Sindoh 3DWOX 2X

What Guider IIs V2 does better (6) and where 3DWOX 2X wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Flashforge Guider IIs V2
Flashforge · 2021Guider IIs V2
6 advantages≈ $1,700
vs
Sindoh 3DWOX 2X
Sindoh · 20203DWOX 2X
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $3,000
Higher score
7.9Build volume6.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Guider IIs V23DWOX 2X
549 × 561490490 × 573466
Guider IIs V23DWOX 2XDifference
Height561 mm573 mm−12 mm
Width549 mm490 mm+59 mm
Depth490 mm466 mm+24 mm
Weight30 kg31 kg−1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Guider IIs V2 better than 3DWOX 2X?

  1. Build volume21 L vs 13.7 L+53%
  2. Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · 3DWOX 2X: No
  3. Number of supported materials7 vs 32.3×
  4. Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 200 mm+25%
  5. Build width (X)280 mm vs 228 mm+23%
  6. Weight30 kg vs 31 kg+3%

Why is 3DWOX 2X better than Guider IIs V2?

  1. Finest layer height0.1 mm vs 0.05 mm2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sindoh 3DWOX 2XSindoh 3DWOX 2X≈ $3,0008.0
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Motion system—Bed-slinger (i3-style)
Build volume
Build width (X)280 mm228 mm
Build depth (Y)250 mm200 mm
Build height (Z)300 mm300 mm
Build volume21 L13.7 L
Print quality
Finest layer height0.1 mm0.05 mm
Thickest layer height0.4 mm0.4 mm
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Extruder & hotend
Default nozzle—0.4 mm
Toolheads1—
Nozzles1—
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLAPLA, ABS, Flexible
Number of supported materials73
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)YesNo
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
Ethernet—Yes
USBYesYes
Screen size—5″
Touchscreen—Yes
Size & power
Width549 mm490 mm
Depth490 mm466 mm
Height561 mm573 mm
Weight30 kg31 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare