- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Guider IIs V2 vs 3DWOX 1X
Flashforge Guider IIs V2 vs Sindoh 3DWOX 1X
What Guider IIs V2 does better (5) and where 3DWOX 1X wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Build volume6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Guider IIs V23DWOX 1X
| Guider IIs V2 | 3DWOX 1X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 561 mm | 573 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 549 mm | 490 mm | +59 mm |
| Depth | 490 mm | 466 mm | +24 mm |
| Weight | 30 kg | 31 kg | −1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Guider IIs V2 better than 3DWOX 1X?
- Build volume21 L vs 13.7 L+53%
- Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 200 mm+25%
- Build width (X)280 mm vs 228 mm+23%
- Number of supported materials7 vs 6+17%
- Weight30 kg vs 31 kg+3%
Why is 3DWOX 1X better than Guider IIs V2?
- Finest layer height0.1 mm vs 0.05 mm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 280 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 250 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 21 L | 13.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | ABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLA | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PA, etc |
| Number of supported materials | 7 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 549 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 490 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 561 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 30 kg | 31 kg |
