How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X156 vs Sonic Mega 8K V2

EPAX X156 vs Phrozen Sonic Mega 8K V2

What X156 does better (4) and where Sonic Mega 8K V2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X156
EPAX · 2020X156
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ $2,800
vs
Phrozen Sonic Mega 8K V2
8.7Score
3 advantages≈ $3,200
Higher score
5.6Print quality6.2
9.3Build volume9.2
3.3Ease of use4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

X156Sonic Mega 8K V2
508 × 787431470 × 680400
X156Sonic Mega 8K V2Difference
Height787 mm680 mm+107 mm
Width508 mm470 mm+38 mm
Depth431 mm400 mm+31 mm
Weight45 kg42 kg+3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X156 better than Sonic Mega 8K V2?

  1. Build volume26.8 L vs 24.4 L+10%
  2. EthernetYes · Sonic Mega 8K V2: No
  3. Build depth (Y)194 mm vs 185 mm+5%
  4. Build width (X)345 mm vs 330 mm+5%

Why is Sonic Mega 8K V2 better than X156?

  1. LCD resolution class4K vs 8K2×
  2. Screen size3.5″ vs 5″+43%
  3. Weight45 kg vs 42 kg+7%
Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X156EPAX X156≈ $2,8007.6
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered asFully assembledFully assembled
Build volume
Build width (X)345 mm330 mm
Build depth (Y)194 mm185 mm
Build height (Z)400 mm400 mm
Build volume26.8 L24.4 L
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm0.01 mm
Thickest layer height—0.3 mm
Enclosure
Air filter (carbon / HEPA)—Yes
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class4K8K
LCD size—15″
XY resolution—43 µm
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBUSB
Wi-Fi—No
EthernetYesNo
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size3.5″5″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width508 mm470 mm
Depth431 mm400 mm
Height787 mm680 mm
Weight45 kg42 kg
Rated power—240 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare