How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X10 vs Sonic Mega 8K S

EPAX X10 vs Phrozen Sonic Mega 8K S

What X10 does better (3) and where Sonic Mega 8K S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X10
EPAX · 2020X10
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Phrozen Sonic Mega 8K S
Phrozen · 2023Sonic Mega 8K S
5.8Score
6 advantages≈ $1,400
Higher score
2.9Print quality3.6
7.5Build volume8.6
3.3Ease of use2.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X10Sonic Mega 8K S
360 × 530380380 × 560472
X10Sonic Mega 8K SDifference
Height530 mm560 mm−30 mm
Width360 mm380 mm−20 mm
Depth380 mm472 mm−92 mm
Weight23 kg26 kg−3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X10 better than Sonic Mega 8K S?

  1. Finest layer height0.01 mm vs 0.3 mm30×
  2. EthernetYes · Sonic Mega 8K S: No
  3. Weight23 kg vs 26 kg+13%

Why is Sonic Mega 8K S better than X10?

  1. Build volume7.3 L vs 18.3 L2.5×
  2. LCD resolution class2K vs 8K4×
  3. XY resolution45 µm vs 43 µm+5%
  4. Build height (Z)250 mm vs 300 mm+20%
  5. Build width (X)216 mm vs 330 mm+53%
  6. Build depth (Y)135 mm vs 185 mm+37%
Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X10EPAX X10≈ $1,2005.3
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered asFully assembledFully assembled
Build volume
Build width (X)216 mm330 mm
Build depth (Y)135 mm185 mm
Build height (Z)250 mm300 mm
Build volume7.3 L18.3 L
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm0.3 mm
Thickest layer height—0.3 mm
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class2K8K
XY resolution45 µm43 µm
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBUSB
Wi-Fi—No
EthernetYesNo
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size3.5″3.5″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width360 mm380 mm
Depth380 mm472 mm
Height530 mm560 mm
Weight23 kg26 kg
Rated power—240 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare