How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stellar Mini Pro vs Sonic Mega 8K S

Emake3D Stellar Mini Pro vs Phrozen Sonic Mega 8K S

What Stellar Mini Pro does better (4) and where Sonic Mega 8K S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Emake3D Stellar Mini Pro
Emake3D · 2025Stellar Mini Pro
5.6Score
4 advantages≈ $1,400
vs
Phrozen Sonic Mega 8K S
Phrozen · 2023Sonic Mega 8K S
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,400
Higher score
9.0Print quality3.6
3.4Build volume8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stellar Mini ProSonic Mega 8K S
355 × 546274380 × 560472
Stellar Mini ProSonic Mega 8K SDifference
Height546 mm560 mm−14 mm
Width355 mm380 mm−25 mm
Depth274 mm472 mm−198 mm
Weight18.6 kg26 kg−7.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stellar Mini Pro better than Sonic Mega 8K S?

  1. XY resolution18 µm vs 43 µm2.4×
  2. LCD resolution class9K vs 8K+12%
  3. Screen size6.8″ vs 3.5″+94%
  4. Weight18.6 kg vs 26 kg+40%

Why is Sonic Mega 8K S better than Stellar Mini Pro?

  1. Build volume2.1 L vs 18.3 L8.7×
  2. Build height (Z)180 mm vs 300 mm+67%
  3. Build depth (Y)78 mm vs 185 mm2.4×
  4. Build width (X)153 mm vs 330 mm2.2×
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered as—Fully assembled
Build volume
Build width (X)153 mm330 mm
Build depth (Y)78 mm185 mm
Build height (Z)180 mm300 mm
Build volume2.1 L18.3 L
Speed
Resin print speed80 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.3 mm
Thickest layer height—0.3 mm
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class9K8K
XY resolution18 µm43 µm
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSBUSB
Wi-Fi—No
Ethernet—No
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size6.8″3.5″
Touchscreen—Yes
Size & power
Width355 mm380 mm
Depth274 mm472 mm
Height546 mm560 mm
Weight18.6 kg26 kg
Rated power—240 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare