How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stellar I vs X10

Emake3D Stellar I vs EPAX X10

What Stellar I does better (2) and where X10 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Emake3D Stellar I
Emake3D · 2025Stellar I
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ $1,700
Higher score
vs
EPAX X10
EPAX · 2020X10
5.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,200
6.6Print quality2.9
7.4Build volume7.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stellar IX10
355 × 564310360 × 530380
Stellar IX10Difference
Height564 mm530 mm+34 mm
Width355 mm360 mm−5 mm
Depth310 mm380 mm−70 mm
Weight26 kg23 kg+3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stellar I better than X10?

  1. XY resolution19 µm vs 45 µm2.4×
  2. Build width (X)224 mm vs 216 mm+4%

Why is X10 better than Stellar I?

  1. Finest layer height0.025 mm vs 0.01 mm2.5×
  2. Build volume6.8 L vs 7.3 L+7%
  3. Build height (Z)240 mm vs 250 mm+4%
  4. Weight26 kg vs 23 kg+13%
  5. Build depth (Y)127 mm vs 135 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Emake3D Stellar IEmake3D Stellar I≈ $1,7005.7
EPAX X10EPAX X10≈ $1,2005.3
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered as—Fully assembled
Build volume
Build width (X)224 mm216 mm
Build depth (Y)127 mm135 mm
Build height (Z)240 mm250 mm
Build volume6.8 L7.3 L
Speed
Resin print speed40 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.025 mm0.01 mm
Thickest layer height0.1 mm—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class—2K
XY resolution19 µm45 µm
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBEthernet, USB
Wi-FiYes—
Ethernet—Yes
USBYesYes
Screen size—3.5″
Touchscreen—Yes
Size & power
Width355 mm360 mm
Depth310 mm380 mm
Height564 mm530 mm
Weight26 kg23 kg
Rated power360 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare