How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stellar 2 vs Slash Pro

Emake3D Stellar 2 vs Uniz Slash Pro

What Stellar 2 does better (3) and where Slash Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Emake3D Stellar 2
Emake3D · 2024Stellar 2
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $4,000
vs
Uniz Slash Pro
Uniz · 2020Slash Pro
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ $4,500
Higher score
5.8Speed8.5
3.8Print quality5.8
9.1Build volume7.8
8.5Ease of use6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stellar 2Slash Pro
490 × 1,645.5438.5350 × 730400
Stellar 2Slash ProDifference
Height1,645.5 mm730 mm+915.5 mm
Width490 mm350 mm+140 mm
Depth438.5 mm400 mm+38.5 mm
Weight95 kg18 kg+77 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stellar 2 better than Slash Pro?

  1. Build volume26.6 L vs 9.2 L2.9×
  2. Build width (X)353 mm vs 192 mm+84%
  3. Build depth (Y)198 mm vs 120 mm+65%

Why is Slash Pro better than Stellar 2?

  1. Resin print speed90 mm/h vs 200 mm/h2.2×
  2. Weight95 kg vs 18 kg5.3×
  3. Finest layer height0.025 mm vs 0.02 mm+25%
  4. Build height (Z)380 mm vs 400 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Emake3D Stellar 2Emake3D Stellar 2≈ $4,0008.3
Uniz Slash ProUniz Slash Pro≈ $4,5009.1
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Build volume
Build width (X)353 mm192 mm
Build depth (Y)198 mm120 mm
Build height (Z)380 mm400 mm
Build volume26.6 L9.2 L
Speed
Resin print speed90 mm/h200 mm/h
Print quality
Finest layer height0.025 mm0.02 mm
Thickest layer height0.1 mm—
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Enclosure
Max chamber temperature40 °C—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class8K—
LCD size16″—
XY resolution46 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size5″—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width490 mm350 mm
Depth438 mm400 mm
Height1,646 mm730 mm
Weight95 kg18 kg
Rated power250 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare