- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- XFAB 2500HD vs Stellar III
DWS XFAB 2500HD vs Emake3D Stellar III
What XFAB 2500HD does better (2) and where Stellar III wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
XFAB 2500HDStellar III
| XFAB 2500HD | Stellar III | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 642 mm | 1,290 mm | −648 mm |
| Width | 400 mm | 505 mm | −105 mm |
| Depth | 606 mm | 760 mm | −154 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 152 kg | −121 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XFAB 2500HD better than Stellar III?
- Finest layer height0.01 mm vs 0.05 mm5×
- Weight31 kg vs 152 kg4.9×
Why is Stellar III better than XFAB 2500HD?
Stellar III has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | SLA (laser resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | — | 211 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | — | 118 mm |
| Build height (Z) | — | 35 mm |
| Build volume | — | 0.9 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | — | 30 mm/h |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.1 mm |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| XY resolution | — | 19 µm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 400 mm | 505 mm |
| Depth | 606 mm | 760 mm |
| Height | 642 mm | 1,290 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 152 kg |
| Rated power | 160 W | — |
