How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Ender-3 S1 Pro vs da Vinci Junior Pro X+

Creality Ender-3 S1 Pro vs XYZprinting da Vinci Junior Pro X+

What Ender-3 S1 Pro does better (6) and where da Vinci Junior Pro X+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Creality Ender-3 S1 Pro
Creality · 2022Ender-3 S1 Pro
6 advantages
vs
XYZprinting da Vinci Junior Pro X+
XYZprinting · 2019da Vinci Junior Pro X+
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
5.4Build volume2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Ender-3 S1 Proda Vinci Junior Pro X+
490 × 625455420 × 380430
Ender-3 S1 Proda Vinci Junior Pro X+Difference
Height625 mm380 mm+245 mm
Width490 mm420 mm+70 mm
Depth455 mm430 mm+25 mm
Weight8.6 kg15 kg−6.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Ender-3 S1 Pro better than da Vinci Junior Pro X+?

  1. Build volume13.1 L vs 5.4 L2.4×
  2. Build height (Z)270 mm vs 175 mm+54%
  3. TouchscreenYes · da Vinci Junior Pro X+: No
  4. Weight8.6 kg vs 15 kg+74%
  5. Build width (X)220 mm vs 175 mm+26%
  6. Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 175 mm+26%

Why is da Vinci Junior Pro X+ better than Ender-3 S1 Pro?

  1. Wi-FiNo · Ender-3 S1 Pro: Yes
  2. Number of supported materials1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

General
Technology—FDM / FFF (filament)
Build volume
Build width (X)220 mm175 mm
Build depth (Y)220 mm175 mm
Build height (Z)270 mm175 mm
Build volume13.1 L5.4 L
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.01 mm
Thickest layer height—0.4 mm
Extruder & hotend
Default nozzle—0.4 mm
Toolheads—1
Nozzles—1
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsTPUPETG, PLA
Number of supported materials12
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSB, SD cardWi-Fi, USB, SD card
Wi-FiNoYes
EthernetNoNo
USBYesYes
SD cardYesYes
BluetoothNoNo
Screen size—2.6″
TouchscreenYesNo
Size & power
Width490 mm420 mm
Depth455 mm430 mm
Height625 mm380 mm
Weight8.6 kg15 kg
Rated power350 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare