- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DP-GEMMA vs 3DWOX 2X
Gembird 3DP-GEMMA vs Sindoh 3DWOX 2X
What 3DP-GEMMA does better (1) and where 3DWOX 2X wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DP-GEMMA3DWOX 2X
| 3DP-GEMMA | 3DWOX 2X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 290 mm | 573 mm | −283 mm |
| Width | 210 mm | 490 mm | −280 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 466 mm | −256 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 31 kg | −28 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DP-GEMMA better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Weight3 kg vs 31 kg10.3×
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than 3DP-GEMMA?
- Build volume1.3 L vs 13.7 L10.5×
- Build height (Z)100 mm vs 300 mm3×
- Finest layer height0.1 mm vs 0.05 mm2×
- Wi-FiNo · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
- Number of supported materials1 vs 33×
- EthernetNo · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
- Build width (X)120 mm vs 228 mm+90%
- Build depth (Y)110 mm vs 200 mm+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 120 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 110 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 100 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 1.3 L | 13.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA | PLA, ABS, Flexible |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 210 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 290 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 31 kg |
