- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- X10 vs Inkspire
EPAX X10 vs Zortrax Inkspire
What X10 does better (6) and where Inkspire wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X10Inkspire
| X10 | Inkspire | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 530 mm | 420 mm | +110 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 210 mm | +150 mm |
| Depth | 380 mm | 210 mm | +170 mm |
| Weight | 23 kg | 6.2 kg | +16.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X10 better than Inkspire?
- Build volume7.3 L vs 1.7 L4.3×
- Finest layer height0.01 mm vs 0.03 mm3×
- XY resolution45 µm vs 50 µm+11%
- Build height (Z)250 mm vs 175 mm+43%
- Build depth (Y)135 mm vs 74 mm+82%
- Build width (X)216 mm vs 132 mm+64%
Why is Inkspire better than X10?
- LCD resolution class2K vs 3K+50%
- Weight23 kg vs 6.2 kg3.7×
- Screen size3.5″ vs 4″+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | MSLA (LCD resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Delivered as | Fully assembled | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 216 mm | 132 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 135 mm | 74 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 175 mm |
| Build volume | 7.3 L | 1.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | — | 36 mm/h |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | 0.03 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | — | Yes |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD resolution class | 2K | 3K |
| LCD resolution (px) | — | 2560 × 1440 |
| LCD size | — | 5.5″ |
| XY resolution | 45 µm | 50 µm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 3.5″ | 4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | — | No |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 360 mm | 210 mm |
| Depth | 380 mm | 210 mm |
| Height | 530 mm | 420 mm |
| Weight | 23 kg | 6.2 kg |
| Rated power | — | 50 W |
